Ronald L. Anderson

Ronald L. Anderson is a Young Scholar at HLI America. He is a freshman at Stanford University where he majors in English and Psychology. Ronald moved to Katy, Texas during his high school years and at the age of seventeen, he converted to Catholicism after four years of learning and experiencing the Faith. He was Confirmed at the Easter Vigil in 2011. He is is passionate about the pro-life, pro-family cause because of the tendency of society today to devalue the importance of life and of the traditional family.

A Sacrosanct Amorality

Wednesday, September 14th, 2011

By Ronald L. Anderson

Today’s relativistic, anti-religious culture is obliterating the moral fiber of many young adults and, ironically, those under its sway hold to its doctrines with religious zeal. During a recent discussion with a friend, the subject of homosexuality came up. I stated, in accordance with the teachings of the Church, that the inclination is disordered in and of itself (though not necessarily sinful), and that engaging in homosexual acts is definitely sinful. She then proceeded to ask me why I thought this way. I replied that man is obviously “made” for woman, and woman for man: “It’s only natural,” I said. Visibly appalled, she asked me, “How can we know what’s natural?” I must admit, I had no rebuttal.

I felt that the answer, being glaringly obvious, did not necessitate a harrowing discourse on the tenets of natural law. Unfortunately, our culture has become relativistic to the degree that any strongly held moral belief is categorically counter-cultural. More than this, in its quest to be “tolerant,” our culture finds nearly every action acceptable—as long as people are “being themselves.”

(more…)

The Desire for Suicide is Always Unsound

Monday, August 8th, 2011

By Ronald L. Anderson

God gives the heaviest crosses to those in whom he wishes to produce the most holiness. Yet in a world so disconnected from this truth—and from Truth Himself—many are blind to the gift that such a cross can be, viewing them as merely burdens from which no good could possibly come.

Despite the fact that suicidal tendencies have historically been considered symptoms of an unsound mind, those who promote the “right-to-die” insist that mental stability is a main criterion for being eligible to use their services. For example, the State of Oregon has an online form available here that is required before “patients” are allowed to proceed with their desire to procure state-sanctioned death. It contains the following language just above the area for the consulting psychiatrist to sign, indicating his approval:

I have determined through evaluation that the above-named patient is not suffering from a psychiatric or psychological disorder, or depression causing impaired judgment, in conformance with ORS 127.825 [The “Counseling Referral” portion of the Oregon’s “Death with Dignity” law].

 

Yet, it can reasonably be argued that those who suffer from terminal illnesses,might not be in the proper frame of mind to make such a drastic decision. At the prospect of any suffering, many search for the surest way of alleviation. Therefore, a request for suicide made by a person in grave pain should be interpreted carefully through the lens of that suffering, and alternative solutions should be sought.

(more…)